BEGIN:VCALENDAR
VERSION:2.0
PRODID:-//Sabre//Sabre VObject 4.5.8//EN
CALSCALE:GREGORIAN
BEGIN:VTIMEZONE
TZID:Europe/Zurich
X-LIC-LOCATION:Europe/Zurich
TZURL:http://tzurl.org/zoneinfo/Europe/Zurich
BEGIN:DAYLIGHT
TZOFFSETFROM:+0100
TZOFFSETTO:+0200
TZNAME:CEST
DTSTART:19810329T020000
RRULE:FREQ=YEARLY;BYMONTH=3;BYDAY=-1SU
END:DAYLIGHT
BEGIN:STANDARD
TZOFFSETFROM:+0200
TZOFFSETTO:+0100
TZNAME:CET
DTSTART:19961027T030000
RRULE:FREQ=YEARLY;BYMONTH=10;BYDAY=-1SU
END:STANDARD
END:VTIMEZONE
BEGIN:VEVENT
UID:news89@ethnologie.philhist.unibas.ch
DTSTAMP;TZID=Europe/Zurich:20190426T152711
DTSTART;TZID=Europe/Zurich:20190515T161500
SUMMARY:Being (Un)Familiar: Methodological Reflections on Shadowing in a Sw
 iss Acute Hospital in Comparison with Participation and Observation in Gui
 nea
DESCRIPTION:Based on the edited volumes by Amit (2003) ‘Constructing the 
 Field: Ethnographic Fieldwork in the Contemporary World’ as well as Cole
 man and Collins (2006) ‘Locating the Field: Space\, Place and Context in
  Anthropology’\, I reflect on the two ‘fields’ I have done research 
 in so far. For my PhD\, I conducted one year of anthropological fieldwork 
 on women and politics in Guinea. For my current postdoctoral projects at t
 he Institute of Geography at the University of Bern\, I am doing an instit
 utional ethnography on intersectionality in a Swiss acute hospital. In thi
 s presentation\, I think about the similarities and differences between th
 ese two\, at first sight very distinct ‘fields’. Hereby\, I compare th
 e people I researched\, the methodological approach I used\, my positional
 ity in the ‘field’\, and finally the implied ethical issues in both si
 tes. More generally\, I self-critically ask what kind of implicit and expl
 icit assumptions I had and how they influenced my fieldwork. How did being
  (un)familiar with the research contexts influence my anthropological rese
 arch?\\r\\n\\r\\n\\r\\nFurther information on and program of the Wednesday
  Colloquium
X-ALT-DESC: \nBased on the edited volumes by Amit (2003) ‘Constructing th
 e Field: Ethnographic Fieldwork in the Contemporary World’ as well as Co
 leman and Collins (2006) ‘Locating the Field: Space\, Place and Context 
 in Anthropology’\, I reflect on the two ‘fields’ I have done researc
 h in so far. For my PhD\, I conducted one year of anthropological fieldwor
 k on women and politics in Guinea. For my current postdoctoral projects at
  the Institute of Geography at the University of Bern\, I am doing an inst
 itutional ethnography on intersectionality in a Swiss acute hospital. In t
 his presentation\, I think about the similarities and differences between 
 these two\, at first sight very distinct ‘fields’. Hereby\, I compare 
 the people I researched\, the methodological approach I used\, my position
 ality in the ‘field’\, and finally the implied ethical issues in both 
 sites. More generally\, I self-critically ask what kind of implicit and ex
 plicit assumptions I had and how they influenced my fieldwork. How did bei
 ng (un)familiar with the research contexts influence my anthropological re
 search?\n\n\n<link en/research/current-research-and-debates/ - - "Opens in
 ternal link in current window">Further information on and program of the W
 ednesday Colloquium</link>
DTEND;TZID=Europe/Zurich:20190515T180000
END:VEVENT
END:VCALENDAR
